ontological argument from St. Anselm to contemporary philosophers by A. Plantinga

Cover of: ontological argument from St. Anselm to contemporary philosophers | A. Plantinga

Published by Macmillan .

Written in English

Read online

Edition Notes

Book details

Statementby A. Plantinga.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL20785755M

Download ontological argument from St. Anselm to contemporary philosophers

One must read gingerly through The Ontological Argument from St. Anslem to Contemporary Philosophers. The book is not for rank beginners to the subject.

There are excerpts the works of philosophers who tackled the Ontological proof for God's existence, in their own words, with little editorial guidance/5(3). Anselm’s Ontological Argument. There is an enormous literature on the material in Proslogion II-III.

Some commentators deny that St. Anselm tried to put forward any proofs of the existence of God. Even among commentators who agree that St. Anselm intended to prove the existence of God, there is disagreement about where the proof is.

One must read gingerly through The Ontological Argument from St. Anslem to Contemporary Philosophers. The book is not for rank beginners to the subject. There are excerpts the works of philosophers who tackled the Ontological proof for God's existence, in their own words, with little editorial guidance/5.

The ontological argument is the attempt to prove, simply from an examination of the concept of God, that the being to which that concept would apply must in fact exist. The ontological argument in major philosophers: This argument was developed first by St Anselm. It was critized and somewhat ambivalently rejected by Thomas Aquinas.

Anselms ontological argument -- Gaunilo: in behalf of the fool -- St. Anselms reply to Gaunilo -- St. Thomas Aquinas -- Descartes statement of the ontological argument -- Objection to Descartes argument by Caterus -- Descartes reply to Caterus -- Objection by a group of seventeenth-century philosophers and theologians -- Descartes reply -- Objection to Descartes argument by P.

Get this from a library. The ontological argument from St Anselm to contemporary philosophers. [Alvin Plantinga]. The first ontological argument in the Western Christian tradition [1] was proposed by Anselm of Canterbury in his work defined God as “a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists” [2], and argued that this being must exist in the mind, even in the mind of the person who denies the existence of God.

Anselm of Canterbury. Wikipedia's reprint from the scholarly Ontological argument from St. Anselm to contemporary philosophers book Britannica on Anselm's life and works.; Anselm, "The Ontological Argument" A short selection of Anselm's argument from Proslogium 2 in the online Reading for Philosophical Inquiry on this site.

Ontological Arguments. ontological argument from St. Anselm to contemporary philosophers book A good discussion with extensive links to the history, classification.

The Ontological Argument, From St. Anselm To Contemporary Philosophers book. Read 2 reviews from the world's largest community for readers/5. Essay Anselm's Ontological Argument Words | 6 Pages.

In Chapter 2 of Anselm's Proslogian, Anselm offers what was later to be characterized as his Ontological Argument, which is an argument for God's existence he felt was so strong that even a fool as is said in Psalms "who has said in his heart, 'There is no God'".

What is common among these versions of ontological argument, including Anselm’s argument for God’s existence, is the claim that it is self-contradictory to deny the existence of a greatest possible being. In other words, for the adherents of the ontological argument, the existence of a greatest possible being is necessary, and He is God.

Buy The ontological argument from St Anselm to contemporary philosophers by Alvin Plantinga (ISBN:) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders/5(3). Saint Anselm of Canterbury (–) was the outstanding Christian philosopher and theologian of the eleventh century.

He is best known for the celebrated “ontological argument” for the existence of God in the Proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology (and indeed to philosophy more generally) go well beyond the ontological argument.

Anselm’s contemporary Gaunilo, Thomas Aquinas, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, J. Mackie, and others have rejected the argument, but many philosophers down to the present have accepted versions of it: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Hegel and his followers, and twentieth-century thinkers Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin : John Frame.

Buy Ontological Argument From ST Anselm To Contemporary Philosophers by Plantinga, Alvin (ed.) (ISBN:) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low 5/5(2). (30 marks) The ontological argument was first formulated by St.

Anselm in the 11th century. It argues the existence of God from a deductive and a priori stance. God is a being than which none greater can be conceived. This is the response given by St Anselm to the fool in the psalm who believed there was no God. eleventh century soon after Anselm introduced the ontological argument.1 Its longevity notwithstanding, however, it seems to me that the strengths and Prosbgion and A Reply to the Foregoing by the Author of the Book in Question) Argument fiom St Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers (New York: Anchor, ), pp.

'Tne. selm’s argument the Ontological Argument, but was unable to have the last word due to the evolution of modal logic.

Contemporary philosophers such as Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin Plantinga, have utilized modal logic to develop new versions of the On-tological Argument. Thus, keeping the Ontological Argument alive for Size: KB. itself. Chapter eight deals with contemporary interpretations of Anselm’s argument; for the most part, it is a meta-critique of recent criticism concerning his ontological argument.

The first chapter is a short introduction. Logan concludes his study with some brief reflections on the philosophical significance of Anselm’s argument.

The Ontological Argument From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers. Categories Anselm in Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy (categorize this paper) Buy the book $ used $ new Amazon page: Call number BTA1.P56 The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument.

Chris Heathwood - - Religious Authors: Alvin Plantinga, University of Notre Dame. Anselm of Canterbury ( - ) was an Italian philosopher and theologian of the Medieval period.

He is often called the founder of Scholasticism, and is considered by many to be the first scholarly philosopher of Christian theology. He is particularly known for his attempt to elaborate a rational system of faith, and as the originator of the Ontological Argument for the existence of.

The ontological argument for God's existence was first laid out in the form we see today by Anselm of Canterbury () who was a monk living in. “The Ontological Argument” by St. Anselm period. About the work. Although Anselm’s argument for God’s existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, Anselm presents the argument as clarification Christian faith.

The heart of his argu-ment is the insight that if God is defined as a “being than which no File Size: KB. Click to read more about The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers by Alvin Plantinga. LibraryThing is a cataloging /5(1).

Saint Anselm of Canterbury, (born /34, Aosta, Lombardy—died Appossibly at Canterbury, Kent, England, feast day April 21), Italian-born theologian and philosopher, known as the father of Scholasticism, a philosophical school of thought that dominated the Middle was recognized in modern times as the originator of the ontological argument for the existence.

Anselm’s argument was controversial even in its time, leading other critics to attempt to debate his ontological argument, as well as some of the greatest thinkers in history over the centuries. In this collection of Philosophers’ Criticisms of Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the Being of God, we hear the opinions of thinkers like John.

Deane, Sidney Norton (), St. Anselm: Proslogium, Monologium, an Appendix in Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilon, and Cur Deus Homo with an Introduction, Bibliography, and Reprints of the Opinions of Leading Philosophers and Writers on the Ontological Argument, Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.

(Republished and expanded as St. Anselm: Basic Era: Medieval philosophy. The contemporary philosopher Richard Taylor suggests in his introduction to The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to contemporary philosophers that embedded within Anselm’s Proslogion are two similar arguments, though Anselm might not.

Then on the basis of the clarification, I hope to show what it was that Gaunilo and St. Thomas attacked, to touch briefly on the relation of the 17th century ontological argument to Anselm's, and in general to indicate the curious round-aboutness of the historical criticism of Anselm.

Essay on Anselm’s Ontological Argument Words | 5 Pages. The ontological argument for God’s existence is a work of art resulting from philosophical argumentation. An ontological argument for the existence of God is one that attempts the method of a priori proof, which utilizes intuition and reason alone.

A modern advocate of the ontological argument is Alvin Plantinga (b) Professor of Philosophy at Notre Dame University, USA. He has forcefully argued that Kant's objection does not conflict with anything in Anselm's argument.

For Anselm does not contingently add existence as a property to God and define him into existence. Saint Anselm: Father of the Scholastics, Archbishop of Canterbury, and Inventor of the Ontological argument.

This video offers a brief introduction to. This is a fine introduction to one of the most frustrating arguments in the history of the philosophy of religion. The argument is (essentially) that the concept of a supreme being must include that being's existence, and since the supreme being is defined as the greatest conceivable, and a being that exists is clearly greater than one that does not, then a supreme being must exist/5.

THOMAS AQUINAS ON ANSELM'S ARGUMENT MATTHEW R. COSGROVE JLhomas criticizes on five separate occasions the argument for God's existence given by Anselm in the Proslogion. The works in which his objections are offered are, in chronological order:x In Primum Librum Sententiarum dist.

3, q. 1, a. 2, 4 & ad 4. Ontological Argument One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological gical arguments are arguments to prove the existence of God based on pure reason alone. They attempt to show that we can deduce God’s existence from, so to speak, the very definition of God.

Anselm of Canterbury proposed the first and. Published on Apr 4, Today we are introducing a new area of philosophy – philosophy of religion. We are starting this unit off with Anselm’s argument for. tradition is St. Anselm, the 12th century Benedictine monk, famous for the so-called ontological argument for the existence of God, an argument about which Murdoch offered interesting, if misguided reflections.

The life and writings of St. Anselm constitute an important moment in. In response to Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument, other writers have made modal versions to express their thoughts about his ontological argument, below are two of those responses.

The first response to Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument comes from: (“Anselm’s Ontological Argument,”Philosophical Review, vol, no.1 (), An ontological argument for the existence of God attempts the method of a priori proof, which uses intuition and reason alone.

In the context of the Abrahamic religions, ontological arguments were first proposed by the Medieval philosophers Avicenna (in The Book of Healing) and Anselm of Canterbury (in his Proslogion).Important variations were developed by later philosophers.

Much has been written about the validity of the ontological argument [1] as a traditional “proof” for the existence of God, but not as much has been written on the ontological argument’s effect on the believer.

Anselm sought to construct an argument such that the very idea of God—known to all mankind—would be sufficient to show that God exists. Anselm, Deane, S. N. and Gaunilo Saint Anselm: basic writings - Open Court - La Salle, Ill.The ontological argument St Anselm and Descartes both famously presented an ontological argument for the existence of God.

(The word ‘ontological’ comes from ‘ontology’, the study of (-ology) of what exists or ‘being’ (ont).) Their versions of the argument are slightly different, but.

72623 views Sunday, November 29, 2020